Showing posts with label commentaryoneducation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label commentaryoneducation. Show all posts

Thursday, May 25, 2023

You Cannot Give False Hopes to Campus Journalists

 Tread the Future Outside When There Is None on the Inside


It would be full fakeness if we talk about journalism and the media as an industry of ideals. 

One that works for the perfection and devotion of its craft—the skill of writing and the honor to bring news.

Yes, as a nation, we train a lot of writers in the meek stage of their lives. 

The young, hungry idealists who want to build a career out of writing and work towards one of the most vaunted professions.  Training young writers as if the profession is a bed of roses, and that everything will make a difference once one lands a job in the industry of the outspoken.

But in truth, the profession is a dismal career once writers get a hold of the antiquity of such ideals where only the brave are exploited, to work for the truth but not for their rights.

 The "old and the knowing" cannot mislead another generation of hopeful journalists who put their heart and passion into writing.  Because history shows they cannot offer any future or any help in making the lives of journalists better.  

Journalists' jobs are hard to find. Yes, you bet you can encourage a lot of writers to be journalists. But once they are in the industry, the truth could push them to a realization that jobs are wanting and security is nowhere in sight.

Another, as a harbinger of news, young writers are sure to toil a hard day’s work for a story that means to everyone. But by the end of the day, no employer can sustain their needs, from social benefits to suitable and meaningful wages.  Journalists are not paid well. Only those who have access to a heaven of connections in their industry.

We can tell the kids, “Anak go and change the world with your brand of writing.”

But by the end of the day, a look at the industry would fail and dash the hopes of the same journalists and media practitioners who work and fight to make the sector a continuing legacy.

We cannot dismay the future generation of journalists by giving them false hopes of what the industry is like and about. Because we enthuse the young to join the field, leaders must ask their own: "Can we create a better future for the young? Can we give them more employment opportunities that do not deny them dignity and respect from workers of other industries? Can we fight and respect our own writers and journalists?"

Journalists meek and ideal are susceptible to all kinds of criticisms and estimations of others,  that can encompass not only their work but also intrude into their private lives.  They have a high chance of being ostracized and scrutinized by workers from other industries because of the indignity of the pay scale and benefits given to media practitioners.  

But the good ones, those that cannot be bribed and swoon over by the "kakilala" culture in the industry, continue to work in the industry out of choice and love for work. 

But as the older ones who went before them, can everyone be honest and tell the little kids they prod into joining this time around that, there is not much future in an industry where there is won over bias and patronage?  

Hurdle first these truths. Brave your writing. But you cannot brave your future as a journalist.

 

 

Monday, May 8, 2023

THE NEED TO SIMPLIFY SCHOOL REQUIREMENTS AND CLASS ACTIVITIES TO PROTECT STUDENTS' COPYRIGHTS

THIS ARTICLE PRESENTS A DISSENTING OPINION ON MULTI-PLATFORM AND APP USE IN ONLINE LEARNING


Modernization has taken its toll on the way the lessons are being given through the blended learning approach, which presents a duality of methods that incorporate face-to-face classes with online learning. THIS DUALITY HAS PAVED THE WAY FOR COMPLICATIONS AND ENCROACHMENT OF STUDENTS' RIGHTS THAT EDUCATORS MAY NOT HAVE FORESEEN, OR HAVE YET TO BE RESOLVED AS A MATTER OF TEACHING OR INSTRUCTIONAL POLICY. 

With homeschool learning, the students are required to log in and make use of online collaborative tool and meeting platforms that are originally conceptualized and tailored to serve professionals and workers, which were later on used to have beneficial applications in the academe.

But this approach to online learning, the use of multi-platform apps, presents complications that could vague the other rights of the schoolers, in order to pursue quality education.

With the use of online learning methods, learners are required to use the camera and reveal a homeschooling setup that may inadvertently expose the privacy of a home to others. 

Apart from this, other weaknesses of online learning relate to the uncontrolled factors that could affect the learning of a child. 

Such as in the case of audio interferences during online learning and discussions that are not always preventable as most houses in the Philippines are not properly tailored and customized to handle a perfectly digital online school arrangement. 

Moreover, the situational condition of a learner’s “neighboring space” would also be beyond the control of anyone geared for online learning.  

Simple noise, traffic commotion, and sound interference in and outside the house can provide additional distractions to homeschooling, and much more to quality learning.

As parents living in the digital age, we are at sufficient knowledge that no modern app or online environment in the world is totally 100 percent safe.

Exposing learners to camera use and other applications online does not only take away a kid’s right to discriminate against camera use because in this case, a school chooses its matter of SOP policy in the learning integration vis-a-vis the use of technology.  

In addition, apps available online have different levels of technicality and hardware requirements.  An ordinary school/ homeschool setup, may not be readily prepared to meet the demands of such technicality, much more to the comprehension of a young learner.

A case in point is a video meeting application (without prejudgment or bias against a specific app),  that requires a great level of technicality.  

A school must take the presumption that nuances in the use of modern apps can complicate a child’s focus and pique interest more in the use of technology, which can dissonate a learner from spending time, learning the core subjects, which educators would like to prioritize on.

ADD TO THIS COMPLICATION IS THE INTEGRITY OF  THE  STUDENTS' COPYRIGHTS, WHICH MAY BE COMPROMISED WITH THE USE OF SUCH APPS IN THE CLASSROOM/ONLINE SCHOOLING. 

THE YOUNG LEARNERS ALREADY FACE WITH ABRUPT CHANGES TO THE TRADITIONAL METHODS OF LEARNING THAT THEY HAVE BEEN ACCUSTOMED TO, COULD BE UNPREPARED TO HANDLE FURTHER LESSONS ON THEIR COPYRIGHTS.

MUCH MORE, USING SPECIFIC APPS THAT ALLOW FOR DESIGNING AND CREATIVE OUTPUTS WHEN DONE IN A PROFESSIONAL PLATFORM,  CAN BE MISTAKEN FOR A PURSUIT BEYOND LEARNING,  AND THUS, CANNOT BE IMPOSED ON  A LEARNER.  

More Disadvantages of Using Apps in Online Learning

THE STEALTH OF COPYRIGHTS INFRINGEMENT CAN BEGIN AT THE LEVEL OF SCHOOLING WHEN TEACHERS BEGIN TO HARNESS A KID’S TALENTS FOR CREATIVE USE. 

THE USE OF SEEMINGLY INNOCENT, COLLABORATIVE APPS CAN BE EXPLOITED FOR PROFIT WHEN LEFT IN THE WRONG HANDS or when an educator pursues this, without a full vista on how the use of such collaborative apps, can affect the learners' copyrights.  

AT THE  EARLY AGE OF LEARNING, COPYRIGHTS ARE BEYOND THE COMPREHENSION OR TECHNICAL KNOW-HOW OF THE YOUNG LEARNERS.

Thus, the Department of Education must regulate and peer review the methods of educational institutions and learning centers, in endorsing the use of technology, specifically in the use of apps that may not be congruent with familiar methods of LEARNING.

It must take a slow review in allowing the use and endorsement of apps, with a purpose.

The use of specific apps in classrooms or online learning MUST NEVER BE OBLIGATORY-- OR  RULE OF USE AND IMPLEMENTATION IN EDUCATION.

DEPED MUST MAKE SURE THAT IN PURSUIT OF FORTIFYING THE EDUCATION OF OUR CHILDREN, THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY MUST NOT encroach on the other basic rights of the students.

If it is true learning that we target to focus on STEM strengths, every educator must know when to discriminate; when to use technology; and when to simplify or amplify.

As parents, we cannot allow kids to accept and learn everything that are available online beyond our reproach and scrutiny.  On the school level, educators must know how to redefine its hold as an educator; and not as an encroacher of the other rights of the learner/s, geared towards blended learning at the time of the new normal.

 

Commentary/ The writer is open for further debate, comment, and discussion on this post.

 

 >>>>> No part of this post may be shared or printed without permission from the author.


Copyrights 2023

Philippines

minor edit time and date stamp: 7:36pm/ by the writer 050823

What Utility Service Providers Can Do to Better Their Service

Two companies posture a "no-care" attitude for consumers. Of late, stalwart companies that provide crucial basic services even dur...